Five years of aftercare of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures
Identifieur interne : 008500 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 008499; suivant : 008501Five years of aftercare of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures
Auteurs : A. Visser ; M. E. Geertman ; H. J. A. Meijer ; G. M. Raghoebar ; J. M. Kwakman [Pays-Bas] ; N. H. J. Creugers ; R. P. Van OortSource :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2002-02.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Femelle, Gencive (transplantation), Humains, Hyperplasie gingivale (), Implants dentaires (effets indésirables), Mandibule, Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Post-cure, Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Reprise du traitement, Résorption alvéolaire (), Résorption alvéolaire (étiologie), Résultat thérapeutique, Rétention de prothèse dentaire, Vestibuloplastie, Échec de restauration dentaire.
- MESH :
- effets indésirables : Implants dentaires.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- étiologie : Gencive, Résorption alvéolaire.
- Wicri :
- topic : Femelle, Groningue, Humains, Hyperplasie gingivale, Mandibule, Mâle, Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Post-cure, Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Reprise du traitement, Résorption alvéolaire, Résultat thérapeutique, Rétention de prothèse dentaire, Vestibuloplastie, Échec de restauration dentaire.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aftercare, Alveolar Bone Loss (etiology), Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery), Blackwell science, Bone level, Branemark, Branemark implant system, Clinical aspects, Clinical implant performance, Clinical implant performance scale, Clinical trial, Complete denture, Conventional dentures, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants (adverse effects), Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Different implant systems, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Endosseous, Endosseous implant systems, Endosseous implants, Evaluation period, Female, Gingiva (transplantation), Gingival Hyperplasia (surgery), Groningen, High number, Humans, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant loss, Implant system, Implant systems, Implants research, Insertion, International journal, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Lower denture, Male, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular overdentures, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial prosthodontics, Maxillofacial surgery, Minor complications, Nijmegen, Nijmegen group, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofacial surgery, Oral rehabilitation, Overdenture, Overdenture vestibulumplasty, Overdentures, Prosthetic, Prosthetic aftercare, Prosthetic dentistry, Retreatment, Superstructure, Surgical, Surgical aftercare, Survival rate, Transmandibular, Transmandibular implant, Transmandibular implant group, Transmandibular implant system, Treatment Outcome, University hospital groningen, Upper denture, Vestibuloplasty.
- MESH :
- chemical , adverse effects : Dental Implants.
- etiology : Alveolar Bone Loss.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Alveolar Bone Loss, Gingival Hyperplasia.
- transplantation : Gingiva.
- Teeft :
- Aftercare, Blackwell science, Bone level, Branemark, Branemark implant system, Clinical aspects, Clinical implant performance, Clinical implant performance scale, Clinical trial, Complete denture, Conventional dentures, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Different implant systems, Edentulous, Edentulous mandible, Edentulous patients, Endosseous, Endosseous implant systems, Endosseous implants, Evaluation period, Female, Groningen, High number, Humans, Implant, Implant insertion, Implant loss, Implant system, Implant systems, Implants research, Insertion, International journal, Lower denture, Male, Mandible, Mandibular, Mandibular dentures, Mandibular overdentures, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial prosthodontics, Maxillofacial surgery, Minor complications, Nijmegen, Nijmegen group, Oral implantology, Oral maxillofacial surgery, Oral rehabilitation, Overdenture, Overdenture vestibulumplasty, Overdentures, Prosthetic, Prosthetic aftercare, Prosthetic dentistry, Retreatment, Superstructure, Surgical, Surgical aftercare, Survival rate, Transmandibular, Transmandibular implant, Transmandibular implant group, Transmandibular implant system, Treatment Outcome, University hospital groningen, Upper denture, Vestibuloplasty.
Abstract
The purpose of this multicentre randomized clinical trial was to analyse surgical and prosthetic aftercare and clinical implant performance of edentulous patients with implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and of patients with conventional dentures, either or not after pre‐prosthetic vestibuloplasty and deepening of the floor of the mouth. The evaluation period was 5 years. The implant systems evaluated were the IMZ implant system, the Brånemark implant system and the Transmandibular Implant system. The centre in Groningen had five groups (n=149) and the centre in Nijmegen had three groups (n=86). The evaluation comprised of surgical and prosthetic aftercare, together with clinical implant performance (CIP). The highest implant loss (29%) is found in the Transmandibular Implant group. All groups had prosthetic revisions and complications according to the CIP‐scale. The majority of the patients in the endosseous implant groups were subject to minor complications. The CIP‐score of the Transmandibular Implant group is significantly higher than the scores of the other groups, because of the high number of lost posts. In 26˙1% of the patients in this group score 4 is given, which means failure of the implant system. From this study it can be concluded that the endosseous implant systems used in this study have less surgical aftercare and a better clinical implant performance than the Transmandibular Implant system and are therefore the systems of choice for the edentulous mandible.
Url:
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00834.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 006190
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 006190
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 003893
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 008777
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 003263
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 003263
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 003263
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 000814
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 000814
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 000814
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 008510
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 008500
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Five years of aftercare of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures</title><author><name sortKey="Visser, A" sort="Visser, A" uniqKey="Visser A" first="A." last="Visser">A. Visser</name></author><author><name sortKey="Geertman, M E" sort="Geertman, M E" uniqKey="Geertman M" first="M. E." last="Geertman">M. E. Geertman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J A" sort="Meijer, H J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H. J. A." last="Meijer">H. J. A. Meijer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G. M." last="Raghoebar">G. M. Raghoebar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kwakman, J M" sort="Kwakman, J M" uniqKey="Kwakman J" first="J. M." last="Kwakman">J. M. Kwakman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Creugers, N H J" sort="Creugers, N H J" uniqKey="Creugers N" first="N. H. J." last="Creugers">N. H. J. Creugers</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R. P." last="Van Oort">R. P. Van Oort</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C4EE21A6B43D1AD3BB8A755064C816A305098C2C</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00834.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C4EE21A6B43D1AD3BB8A755064C816A305098C2C/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006190</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006190</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">006190</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003893</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003893</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2002:Visser A:five:years:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008777</idno><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:11856388</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003263</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003263</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003263</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003263</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">003263</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">003263</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000814</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000814</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000814</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2002:Visser A:five:years:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008510</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">008500</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">008500</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Five years of aftercare of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures</title><author><name sortKey="Visser, A" sort="Visser, A" uniqKey="Visser A" first="A." last="Visser">A. Visser</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Geertman, M E" sort="Geertman, M E" uniqKey="Geertman M" first="M. E." last="Geertman">M. E. Geertman</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J A" sort="Meijer, H J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H. J. A." last="Meijer">H. J. A. Meijer</name><affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G. M." last="Raghoebar">G. M. Raghoebar</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kwakman, J M" sort="Kwakman, J M" uniqKey="Kwakman J" first="J. M." last="Kwakman">J. M. Kwakman</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Nimègue</settlement><region type="province" nuts="2">Gueldre</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Creugers, N H J" sort="Creugers, N H J" uniqKey="Creugers N" first="N. H. J." last="Creugers">N. H. J. Creugers</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R. P." last="Van Oort">R. P. Van Oort</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField"></wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="113">113</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="120">120</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-02">2002-02</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aftercare</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (etiology)</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery)</term><term>Blackwell science</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark implant system</term><term>Clinical aspects</term><term>Clinical implant performance</term><term>Clinical implant performance scale</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants (adverse effects)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Different implant systems</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implant systems</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Evaluation period</term><term>Female</term><term>Gingiva (transplantation)</term><term>Gingival Hyperplasia (surgery)</term><term>Groningen</term><term>High number</term><term>Humans</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Insertion</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial prosthodontics</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Minor complications</term><term>Nijmegen</term><term>Nijmegen group</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture vestibulumplasty</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic aftercare</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Retreatment</term><term>Superstructure</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical aftercare</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Transmandibular</term><term>Transmandibular implant</term><term>Transmandibular implant group</term><term>Transmandibular implant system</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term><term>University hospital groningen</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Vestibuloplasty</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Femelle</term><term>Gencive (transplantation)</term><term>Humains</term><term>Hyperplasie gingivale ()</term><term>Implants dentaires (effets indésirables)</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Post-cure</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Reprise du traitement</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire ()</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire (étiologie)</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Rétention de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Vestibuloplastie</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="effets indésirables" xml:lang="fr"><term>Implants dentaires</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Gingival Hyperplasia</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="transplantation" xml:lang="en"><term>Gingiva</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="étiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Gencive</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aftercare</term><term>Blackwell science</term><term>Bone level</term><term>Branemark</term><term>Branemark implant system</term><term>Clinical aspects</term><term>Clinical implant performance</term><term>Clinical implant performance scale</term><term>Clinical trial</term><term>Complete denture</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Different implant systems</term><term>Edentulous</term><term>Edentulous mandible</term><term>Edentulous patients</term><term>Endosseous</term><term>Endosseous implant systems</term><term>Endosseous implants</term><term>Evaluation period</term><term>Female</term><term>Groningen</term><term>High number</term><term>Humans</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant insertion</term><term>Implant loss</term><term>Implant system</term><term>Implant systems</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Insertion</term><term>International journal</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mandibular</term><term>Mandibular dentures</term><term>Mandibular overdentures</term><term>Maxillofacial</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Maxillofacial prosthodontics</term><term>Maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Minor complications</term><term>Nijmegen</term><term>Nijmegen group</term><term>Oral implantology</term><term>Oral maxillofacial surgery</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Overdenture vestibulumplasty</term><term>Overdentures</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic aftercare</term><term>Prosthetic dentistry</term><term>Retreatment</term><term>Superstructure</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical aftercare</term><term>Survival rate</term><term>Transmandibular</term><term>Transmandibular implant</term><term>Transmandibular implant group</term><term>Transmandibular implant system</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term><term>University hospital groningen</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Vestibuloplasty</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Femelle</term><term>Groningue</term><term>Humains</term><term>Hyperplasie gingivale</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Post-cure</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Reprise du traitement</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Rétention de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Vestibuloplastie</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The purpose of this multicentre randomized clinical trial was to analyse surgical and prosthetic aftercare and clinical implant performance of edentulous patients with implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and of patients with conventional dentures, either or not after pre‐prosthetic vestibuloplasty and deepening of the floor of the mouth. The evaluation period was 5 years. The implant systems evaluated were the IMZ implant system, the Brånemark implant system and the Transmandibular Implant system. The centre in Groningen had five groups (n=149) and the centre in Nijmegen had three groups (n=86). The evaluation comprised of surgical and prosthetic aftercare, together with clinical implant performance (CIP). The highest implant loss (29%) is found in the Transmandibular Implant group. All groups had prosthetic revisions and complications according to the CIP‐scale. The majority of the patients in the endosseous implant groups were subject to minor complications. The CIP‐score of the Transmandibular Implant group is significantly higher than the scores of the other groups, because of the high number of lost posts. In 26˙1% of the patients in this group score 4 is given, which means failure of the implant system. From this study it can be concluded that the endosseous implant systems used in this study have less surgical aftercare and a better clinical implant performance than the Transmandibular Implant system and are therefore the systems of choice for the edentulous mandible.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Pays-Bas</li></country><region><li>Gueldre</li></region><settlement><li>Nimègue</li></settlement></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Creugers, N H J" sort="Creugers, N H J" uniqKey="Creugers N" first="N. H. J." last="Creugers">N. H. J. Creugers</name><name sortKey="Geertman, M E" sort="Geertman, M E" uniqKey="Geertman M" first="M. E." last="Geertman">M. E. Geertman</name><name sortKey="Meijer, H J A" sort="Meijer, H J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H. J. A." last="Meijer">H. J. A. Meijer</name><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G. M." last="Raghoebar">G. M. Raghoebar</name><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R. P." last="Van Oort">R. P. Van Oort</name><name sortKey="Visser, A" sort="Visser, A" uniqKey="Visser A" first="A." last="Visser">A. Visser</name></noCountry><country name="Pays-Bas"><region name="Gueldre"><name sortKey="Kwakman, J M" sort="Kwakman, J M" uniqKey="Kwakman J" first="J. M." last="Kwakman">J. M. Kwakman</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 008500 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 008500 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C4EE21A6B43D1AD3BB8A755064C816A305098C2C
|texte= Five years of aftercare of implant‐retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |